Peer Review Process

All submitted manuscripts are read by Editor in Chief of the JManagER initially for desk evaluation. Unsuitable submitted manuscripts in terms of focus and scope would be rejected promptly without external review. Manuscripts evaluated to be of potential interest to our readership would be sent to the reviewers.

The editors then make a decision based on the reviewer’s recommendation from among several possibilities: rejected, require major revision, need minor revision, or accepted. Determination of the article that will be published in JManagER carried out through double-blind peer review by considering two main aspects, namely: relevance and contribution of articles on the theory and practical development.

Editors and reviewers provide constructive feedback on the evaluation results to the author. The Editor in Chief of the JManagER has the right to decide which manuscripts submitted to the journal should be published.

The manuscript review process usually takes (on average) 4 to 12 weeks. This review period depends on the editors and reviewers' duration in reviewing the manuscript. If the author does not get confirmation from the JManagER for a long time, the author can confirm by email at